iRobot Roomba 890 vs Shark ION ROBOT 750

iRobot Roomba 890 vs Shark ION ROBOT 750

Article navigation

Shark ION ROBOT 750 Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Audio alert makes you hear it even if you upstairs/downstairs or in the other room
  • It is possible to schedule daily cleaning to make your floor stay clean when you are out (note that cleaning schedule depends on Wi-Fi and it does not work without the Internet connection)

Cons

  • Gets stuck in the thicker carpets
  • Misses spots sometimes while cleaning hardwood or laminate floorings

iRobot Roomba 890 Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Brushless rollers to avoid tangles
  • Filters to trap particles to prevent air contamination

Cons

  • Doesn’t make the transition from the floor to the rug that is more than 1 inch
  • Can spill the litter while dustbin detaching

iRobot Roomba 890 vs Shark ION ROBOT 750 – Affordable Assistants

The check of Shark ION ROBOT 750 vs iRobot Roomba 890 permits to match the units features to choose the appropriate gadget between the budget Shark’s model Roomba’s near-high-end one. Both robots can dock themselves and have Wi-Fi connection. They have an auto mode to work without constant control and protective bumpers to avoid damages while performing.

The test iRobot Roomba 890 vs Shark ION ROBOT 750 has clarified not very essential difference between their dustbin capacities (300 ml versus 380 ml respectively) that is not enough for ongoing cleaning without emptying the bin.

When I tried to compare the robots’ suction, I’ve found that Shark’s parameters are not specified while claimed iRobot Roomba’s suction is 1000 Pa. However, both units can handle pet hair and other litter (food crumbs, dust, paper, flour, or sugar) good. Despite not flawless mapping, the robots hit the most places you need to clean.

iRobot Roomba 890 can clean the area up to 1000 ft2 while Shark ION ROBOT 750’s using area is doubled to make it possible to clean medium flat. Besides, Roomba fits small spaces more.

Both robots work silently to let you watch TV or even go to bed while cleaning. Shark ION ROBOT 750 has only 60 db while iRobot Roomba 890 can boast even 58 db that is no more than any split system.

Either Roomba or Shark can clean carpets. iRobot Roomba 890 runs low-pile carpets successfully. However, it cannot remove such types of debris as sugar. Besides, its suction power is not enough to make long-pile carpets completely clean.

Shark ION ROBOT 750 does a decent job when cleaning the carpets. It also has difficulties with deep cleaning of medium and long-pile coverings. The unit includes the BotBoundary tech to keep it out of the carpeted rooms.

Add robot vacuum to compare

We didn't find anything to show here
Votes 1 1
Rating 5 5

Common

Product

iRobot Roomba 890
Shark ION ROBOT 750

Model

Roomba 890
ION ROBOT 750

Brand

iRobot
Shark

Rating

3.9 of 5
4.0 of 5

Reviews

646
1469

Battery

Type

NI-MH
Li-ion

Battery Capacity

1800 mAH
2600 mAH

Battery Life

60 Minutes
90 Minutes

Auto Charging

Charging Time

3-4 hours

Cleaning features

Suction

1000 pa

Dust bin capacity

300 ml
380 ml

Number of cleaning stages

3

Using area

1000 square feet

Noise level

58 db
60 db

Carpet cleaning

Air Filteration

Control

Remote Control

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi frequency requires

2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz

Protection

Drop Sensor Protection

Anti-Collision

Protective bumpers

Power

Voltage

100-240V
100-240V

Frequency

50/60Hz
50/60Hz

Cleaning modes

Auto

Spot

Edge

Single room

Intensive

Features

Color

black
black

Display

Virtual Wall

Time scheduling function

Voice control

Warranty

1 Year
1 Year

Dimensions

Product Size

13 x 13 x 3.6 inches
12.6 x 12.6 x 2.6 inches

Product Weight

8.4 pounds
5.51 pounds

Robot vacuums Comparisono comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 12.8
  • 16.6
  • 12.8iRobot Roomba 890
  • 16.6Shark ION ROBOT 750

The Shark ION ROBOT 750 is better robot vacuum in this comparison. Check Shark ION ROBOT 750 price

iRobot Roomba 890 competitors

Shark ION ROBOT 750 competitors