iRobot Roomba 665 vs Shark ION ROBOT 720

iRobot Roomba 665 vs Shark ION ROBOT 720

Article navigation

Roomba 665 pros & cons

Pros

  • It runs for about 90 minutes with a partial charge
  • Traverses across the hardwood, kitchen rugs, and tile with ease

Cons

  • It doesn’t effectively pick up the crumbs on the wood floor
  • You need an extra open space of 3ftx4ft for the docking area

Shark Ion Robot 720 pros & cons

Pros

  • Excels at removing embedded dirt from carpets
  • Includes the HEPA filter that helps to keep the air clean

Cons

  • It is programmable and can be set to clean on certain days and time
  • It comes with the barrier strips – small rubber bumpers to impede the device from crossing
  • In some cases goes over the same area dozens of times
  • Does get stuck on a table leg

Ion Robot 720 vs Roomba 665 — Keep up with Everyday Mess

The idea to test Shark Ion Robot vs Roomba came to make clear the two devices in the same price segment. Certainly, the name brand Roomba seems to be more reliable. However, their prices are not very different that make think about possible Shark’s advantages.

If to compare the Roomba and Shark’s suction the Roomba 665’s 600 pa are not very impressive. The Shark’s suction of 1000 pa allows the device being better in removing all the dirt from both the floors and carpets. While testing Roomba 665 vs Shark ION ROBOT 720 it became clear that the Shark’s dustbin is nearly twice the size of the Roomba that obviates the need to empty it very often.

As for the using area, there is no difference between those two devices. It is just 1 000 square feet that allow cleaning rather small spaces before the recharge. It is normal for the budget devices and is not a great problem if you are not in a hurry.

Ion Robot 720 vs Roomba 665 is the 62 DBs versus 68 DBs respectively. So, both devices can hardly be quiet, however, their noise level is tolerable and won’t detract you from domestic cares.

After the test Roomba vs Shark on the floor coverings, Roomba gladdens with the ability to clean the medium-pile carpets. Nevertheless, Shark Ion Robot 720 cleans the coverings with the short fibers very fast and thoroughly.

iRobot Roomba 665

iRobot Roomba 665 review

Dec 16, 2019

The Roomba 665 is a decent vacuum cleaning model that is able to cope with its work while its buyer goes about their business. The ability to get under the sofas, jumping over the thresholds, coping ...

Read more
Shark ION ROBOT 720

Shark ION ROBOT 720 review

Aug 27, 2021

The Shark ION Robot 720 isn't among the most feature-packed robotic cleaners, but it will save you a lot of time on your daily cleaning. It's designed mainly for hard floors and low-fiber carpets and...

Read more

Add robot vacuum to compare

We didn't find anything to show here

Common

Product

iRobot Roomba 665
Shark ION ROBOT 720

Model

Roomba 665
ION ROBOT 720

Brand

iRobot
Shark

Rating

4.2 of 5
4.2 of 5

Reviews

19
435

Battery

Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

Battery Capacity

2600 mAH

Battery Life

120 Minutes
90 Minutes

Auto Charging

Charging Time

3 hours
4 hours

Cleaning features

Suction

1000 pa

Dust bin capacity

300 ml

Number of cleaning stages

3
4

Using area

1000 square feet
1000 square feet

Noise level

62 db

Carpet cleaning

Air Filteration

Control

Remote Control

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi frequency requires

has not
has not

Protection

Drop Sensor Protection

Anti-Collision

Protective bumpers

Power

Voltage

100-240V
100-240V

Frequency

50/60Hz
50/60Hz

Cleaning modes

Auto

Spot

Edge

Single room

Intensive

Features

Color

white
gray

Display

Virtual Wall

Time scheduling function

Voice control

Warranty

1 Year
1 Year

Dimensions

Product Size

17.8 x 17.2 x 4.9 inches
12.6 x 12.6 x 2.6 inches

Product Weight

11.45 pounds
5.51 pounds

Robot vacuums Comparisono comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 14.9
  • 13.9
  • 14.9iRobot Roomba 665
  • 13.9Shark ION ROBOT 720

The iRobot Roomba 665 is better robot vacuum in this comparison. Check iRobot Roomba 665 price

iRobot Roomba 665 competitors

Shark ION ROBOT 720 competitors